Mia Goth plays two characters across Ti West’s X trilogy — and seeing both films reveals something unsettling: Pearl and Maxine are mirrors of each other. Pearl, the 2022 prequel, shows exactly where Maxine’s obsession with fame turns her into a killer. Here’s what that connection means for the trilogy, and why the ending of Pearl still lingers.
Director: Ti West · Lead Actress: Mia Goth · Release Year: 2022 · Genre: Slasher · Installment: Second in X trilogy
Quick snapshot
- Ti West directed and co-wrote all three films (Points of Reviews)
- Mia Goth plays Pearl and Maxine Minx (ScreenRant)
- Maxine survives the X massacre (CBR)
- Whether Pearl’s specific mental illness diagnosis is based on any clinical framework
- Production timing relation between Pearl and the 29-year gap films
- Pearl’s killings in 1918 precede X’s 1970s events (CBR)
- MaXXXine jumps to 1980s Hollywood with VHS tape from X shoot (YouTube analysis)
- MaXXXine’s third act leaves Maxine’s acting future uncertain (CBR)
- The trilogy ends with potential for more films (CBR)
The snapshot below consolidates verified details about Pearl’s production and place in the X trilogy.
| Label | Value |
|---|---|
| Director | Ti West |
| Co-Writer | Mia Goth |
| Lead | Mia Goth |
| Year | 2022 |
| Genre | Slasher |
| Trilogy Position | Second installment |
How is MaXXXine related to Pearl?
MaXXXine is the third and final film in Ti West’s trilogy, following X and Pearl. Points of Reviews confirms that the trilogy structure builds from slasher setup through character study to 1980s Hollywood homage. The connection between MaXXXine and Pearl runs deeper than simple chronology: Pearl spies on Maxine and sees her as two sides of the same coin because both share an obsession with stardom, according to CBR.
X trilogy overview
The trilogy spans different eras and production styles. X delivers a classic slasher with strong kills, while Pearl shifts to a character study filmed in bright sunshine. MaXXXine reverses that visual approach entirely — all grit, smoke, and red tones. The 8th Passenger notes this deliberate visual contrast between the films.
Shared characters and timeline
Mia Goth reprises her role as Maxine Minx in MaXXXine alongside Elizabeth Debicki. YouTube breakdown confirms the 1980s setting and the film’s focus on Maxine’s Hollywood rise. A key plot element: a VHS tape from the abandoned X porno shoot is left at Maxine’s door, according to analysis, tying the films together physically.
Pearl’s jealousy of Maxine in X stems from her perception that Maxine represents everything Pearl wanted but will never have — youth, beauty, and the freedom to pursue stardom. This dynamic haunts MaXXXine.
How scary is Pearl the movie?
Pearl leans heavily into psychological horror rather than relying on jump scares or gore for effect. Ti West builds suspense through character study, making the audience sympathize with Pearl before revealing her violent capabilities. Points of Reviews describes the film as allowing Mia Goth to showcase remarkable acting skills in what functions as a character study first and slasher second.
Horror elements breakdown
The film trades X’s direct slasher energy for something more unsettling. Pearl’s violence emerges gradually — beginning with small cruelties and escalating to murder. The 1918 Texas farmhouse setting amplifies isolation and claustrophobia. Halifax Bloggers notes that Pearl deepens X’s themes by letting the audience see the doomed future that awaits Pearl.
Viewer reactions
Online discussions reveal divided opinions on Pearl’s scariness level. Some viewers find the psychological tension more disturbing than X’s explicit kills. Others consider Pearl less frightening due to its slower pacing and focus on character motivation rather than body count.
Pearl sacrifices instant gratification for lingering unease. Viewers expecting X’s pacing may feel underwhelmed; those open to atmospheric horror discover something stickier.
Is Pearl 2022 a good movie?
Critical reception for Pearl was largely positive, with praise centering on Mia Goth’s performance and Ti West’s direction. Cerys Loves Film notes that Ti West dropped X and Pearl in 2022, both positively received. X is a solid slasher with strong cast and kills, while Pearl is a character study that rewards repeat viewings.
Critical reception
Reviewers consistently highlight Pearl’s strength as a standalone film despite its prequel status. Points of Reviews states that X is the most classic slasher flick of the three, but Pearl allows the audience to see Mia Goth truly shine. The film’s willingness to slow down and explore character motivation rather than simply advancing plot earned particular praise.
Audience scores
Audience aggregator scores reflect the critical consensus — Pearl scores well above average for horror releases, though slightly lower than X on some platforms. The film’s 94-minute runtime keeps it efficient, avoiding the bloat that can plague character-driven horror.
Pearl succeeds as both a prequel and a standalone film. For viewers new to the trilogy, it works as an origin story without requiring X as prerequisite. For fans, it recontextualizes Maxine’s survival in X in genuinely unsettling ways.
Why was Pearl smiling at the end?
Pearl’s ending remains the trilogy’s most memorable moment. After killing her father, attending an audition she fails, and murdering the woman who receives the role she wanted, Pearl returns home and sets a feast with her parents’ corpses for Howard. CBR confirms this sequence. The credits roll over an uncomfortable smile that Mia Goth improvised — it was not originally in the script.
Ending scene analysis
Collider explains that Pearl’s ending has her accepting a life she doesn’t deserve, with a gory finale that cements her as beyond redemption. The smile suggests a broken acceptance: she has fully become the monster her circumstances created. The character chooses to continue living this lie rather than face consequences.
Mia Goth comments
Goth has discussed the smile as a moment of self-awareness — Pearl recognizing that she has escaped into a version of reality she can control. The improvised quality adds authenticity: the discomfort on screen reflects genuine improvisation rather than scripted choreography.
Pearl’s smile answers a question X raises: what happened to the young woman who became this killer? The answer is not nature versus nurture but something more disturbing — a choice made and remade every day, covered in blood and denial.
The implication: that smile lingers because it refuses easy judgment, leaving audiences to grapple with Pearl’s agency in her own monstrousness.
What mental illness does Pearl have in the movie?
The film depicts Pearl with unstable emotional responses, delusions about her future, and violent outbursts triggered by frustration. However, Pearl does not receive a specific diagnosis within the narrative — the film presents symptoms without clinical labeling.
Character psychology
Pearl’s psychological presentation in the film suggests patterns resembling borderline personality features, postpartum depression, or religious fervor-induced dissociation. The character exists in a state of trapped longing — wanting stardom she cannot reach while caring for an aging, speech-impaired father on a remote farm.
Film depictions
Ti West and Mia Goth chose to show psychological distress through behavior rather than explicit diagnosis. This approach allows audiences to interpret Pearl’s state through their own frameworks rather than accepting a single clinical perspective. The deliberate ambiguity strengthens the character’s universality — many viewers recognize aspects of her emotional state even without shared circumstances.
Pearl’s mental state is presented as consequence and cause simultaneously — her circumstances create distress, but her choices compound it. Viewers expecting clear diagnostic categories will find the film frustrating; those open to behavioral observation discover richer material.
What this means: by refusing clinical labels, Ti West invites viewers to project their own interpretations onto Pearl, making her more unsettling precisely because she defies easy categorization.
Three films, three perspectives on stardom obsession: X shows its victims, Pearl shows its origin, and MaXXXine shows its continuation. Halifax Bloggers observes that crafting a trilogy over a few years that not only stands as a cohesive narrative but also explores different aspects of genre filmmaking is no small feat.
The pattern across the trilogy: Mia Goth’s dual performances create an unbroken thread linking Pearl’s past violence to Maxine’s present ambition, with each film reframing what came before.
A direct comparison of the three films reveals how Ti West uses visual and thematic shifts to distinguish each installment while maintaining narrative cohesion.
| Aspect | X | Pearl | MaXXXine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting | 1970s Texas farmhouse | 1918 Texas farm | 1980s Hollywood |
| Main protagonist | Maxine Minx | Pearl | Maxine Minx |
| Genre approach | Classic slasher | Character study | 80s homage |
| Visual palette | Gritty realism | Bright sunshine | Grit, smoke, red tones |
| Violence style | Direct, graphic kills | Gradual escalation | Bloody rush finale |
| Mia Goth’s role | Maxine | Pearl | Maxine |
Upsides
- Mia Goth delivers a career-defining dual performance
- Pearl works as both prequel and standalone film
- Ti West’s direction balances horror and sympathy
- The ending recontextualizes X’s events
- Psychological depth rewards repeat viewings
Downsides
- Slower pacing may frustrate slasher fans expecting X’s energy
- No specific mental illness diagnosis creates ambiguity some find unsatisfying
- The smile ending polarizes viewers
- Prequel status means Maxine’s fate is known going in
“Pearl’s obsession with Maxine is special because she sees them as two sides of the same coin.”
— CBR (Film Analysis)
“Pearl is representative of convention, while Maxine represents change.”
— ScreenRant (Film Analysis)
“X is the most classic slasher flick of the three. Pearl allows the audience to see Mia Goth truly shine.”
— Points of Reviews (Film Review)
Related reading: Last of Us Season 3 · Cinema Guzzo Marche Central
Pearl’s obsessive psyche and descent into violence receive deeper scrutiny in this psychological horror analysis, enriching the mirror to Maxine’s arc across Ti West’s trilogy.
Frequently asked questions
Who directed Pearl 2022 film?
Ti West directed Pearl (2022). He also co-wrote the film alongside Mia Goth and served as director, writer, and producer across all three films in the X trilogy.
What is the genre of Pearl?
Pearl is classified as a slasher horror film, though it leans more heavily into psychological horror and character study compared to its predecessor X. It balances genre conventions with dramatic filmmaking.
Where can I watch Pearl?
Pearl is available on streaming platforms including Shudder and Amazon Prime Video. Physical media releases on Blu-ray and DVD are also available through various retailers.
What is Pearl about?
Pearl follows a young farm woman in 1918 Texas who dreams of escaping her rural life to become a Hollywood star. As her aspirations collide with reality, she descends into violence and madness. The film serves as a prequel to X (2022).
Is Pearl connected to X?
Pearl is the second installment in Ti West’s X trilogy and serves as a prequel to X (2022). It reveals the backstory of Pearl, who appears as an antagonist in X, and explains her obsession with youth and stardom that drives her killings in the original film.
Who stars in Pearl 2022?
Mia Goth stars as the titular Pearl. The cast also includes David Corenswet, Tandi Wright, Matthew Newarte, and others. Mia Goth notably co-wrote the film and plays both Pearl and Maxine Minx across the trilogy.
What are Pearl reviews like?
Pearl received largely positive reviews from critics, with particular praise for Mia Goth’s performance and Ti West’s direction. Reviewers highlighted the film’s effectiveness as both a standalone character study and a prequel that enriches X’s events. Audience scores similarly reflect strong reception.
Related stories
Marc Tremblay is Managing Editor at Kelowna Daily, running the daily news list, commissioning and headline review.